AI in Schools: Who’s Accountable When Technology Gets Wrong?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming Australian education. From automated grading systems to adaptive learning platforms, schools are increasingly adopting AI to streamline teaching and personalise learning. However, as the use of AI grows, so do the concerns—especially around accountability, privacy, bias, and errors. When technology misfires, the question becomes: who is responsible—the teacher, the school, the developer, or the government?
The Rise of AI in Australian Education
AI technologies have found their way into classrooms through learning management systems, virtual tutors, plagiarism detectors, and predictive analytics tools. The Australian Department of Education has encouraged innovation but also acknowledged the need for ethical frameworks and data protection standards.
Yet, the rapid adoption of AI raises complex questions about oversight. Unlike traditional teaching methods, AI systems make autonomous decisions—sometimes based on algorithms that even their developers struggle to fully explain.
When AI Gets It Wrong
Imagine a scenario where an AI grading tool incorrectly flags a student for plagiarism or unfairly downgrades assignments due to biased training data. Such incidents have already been reported internationally, and similar cases in Australia seem inevitable as schools embrace automation.
Errors in AI systems can harm students’ reputations, impact their grades, and cause psychological distress. More concerningly, these systems can reinforce existing inequalities if they are trained on biased datasets.
The core issue lies in responsibility. Teachers rely on AI tools to save time; developers claim they cannot control how schools implement their products; and policymakers often lag behind in regulating technology in education.
Who Bears the Responsibility?
In Australia, determining liability depends on the context and nature of the failure. If an AI system malfunctions due to poor configuration or human oversight, responsibility may rest with the school administration or teacher. If the issue stems from flawed software design, the developer or provider could be held accountable under Australian Consumer Law or data privacy regulations.
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) play a vital role in protecting student data collected by AI systems. Schools must ensure they have informed consent from students and parents, and that data is stored securely and used only for legitimate educational purposes.
However, the law struggles to keep pace with technology. Unlike in Europe, where the EU’s AI Act sets out clear liability frameworks, Australia is still developing its approach. The Australian Human Rights Commission’s 2021 AI Rights Report called for stronger regulation to prevent discrimination and ensure transparency in AI-driven decision-making.
The Ethical Dimension
Beyond legal responsibility lies an ethical debate. Should teachers trust algorithms to make educational judgments? Can a machine understand context, creativity, or emotional well-being?
Many educators argue that AI should support, not replace, human decision-making. Teachers bring empathy and nuance—qualities AI cannot replicate. Schools must strike a balance between efficiency and ethical responsibility.
Transparency is also essential. Students and parents have the right to know when AI is used, how it operates, and how its decisions are reviewed. Without this, trust in technology can erode quickly.
Building a Responsible AI Framework for Schools
Australia’s education system needs a national framework that clarifies accountability when AI systems go wrong. This includes:
Clear policies defining who is responsible for data accuracy, misuse, and algorithmic errors.
Regular audits of AI tools to identify bias or unintended consequences.
Teacher training on AI ethics, privacy, and implementation.
Student and parent education about data rights and consent.
Legal guidelines that specify liability between schools, software vendors, and government bodies.
The Australian Government’s Department of Industry, Science and Resources has already released guidelines for AI ethics, emphasising fairness, accountability, and transparency. Schools can adapt these principles to ensure they use AI responsibly and align with community expectations.
Looking Ahead
AI is here to stay, and its potential to enhance learning is undeniable. But as with all technology, human oversight is crucial. The challenge lies in ensuring that innovation does not outpace ethics or accountability.
Ultimately, responsibility should be shared. Schools must uphold transparency and care for their students; developers must prioritise safety and fairness; and governments must craft regulations that protect young Australians without stifling innovation.
As AI becomes a fixture in classrooms, Australia’s approach to responsible technology governance will set the tone for future generations.
Stay informed about how emerging technologies impact Australian education and society.
Contact New South Lawyers today. Follow our General Topical News Issues series for expert insights, legal updates, and balanced perspectives on technology, ethics, and accountability in the modern classroom.
