Elder law and succession planning often carry emotional and financial stakes, especially when families navigate complex legal disputes and estate planning. Let's explore some recent Australian cases that illustrate the pitfalls and protections in elder law. From agreements around mutual wills to preventing elder financial abuse, these cases offer valuable lessons for families and individuals planning their estates.

One of the more intricate issues in elder law is the "mutual wills agreement." The recent case Re Miglic involved Kurt and Marilyn Miglic, who created wills in 1993, agreeing to leave their estates to each other, with remaining assets going to Kurt’s children, Lisa and Andrea. However, Marilyn later revised her will several times after Kurt’s death, resulting in assets being distributed differently.

The court had to decide if Kurt and Marilyn had an enforceable agreement not to alter their wills without mutual consent. Ultimately, the court upheld that an agreement existed and that Marilyn's estate was to be managed based on her 1993 will. This case underscores the importance of clear documentation when making mutual wills, which could prevent future complications and ensure that family members’ wishes are honoured as intended.

In Walters v Dawson, the court examined the enforceability of gifts made in wills where a beneficiary is also a witness. Alan Hooper’s will named his partner as the sole beneficiary, but since she was also a witness, her inheritance was technically void under the Succession Act 2006. However, the court found that the gift was valid, noting the couple's de facto relationship and other supporting evidence.

This case highlights how simple mistakes, such as having a beneficiary witness a will, can lead to major complications. To avoid this, individuals should ensure that witnesses to their wills have no personal interest in the outcome, thereby protecting the validity of their estate planning decisions.

Executor roles can be demanding, especially when family disputes arise. In Pirrottina v Pirrottina, two brothers, Sam and Rocco, were co-executors of their parents’ estate. The court had to determine whether Rocco could access privileged communications that might support his claim to a share of their family farm.

The court held that an executor’s primary duty is to act in the estate’s best interest rather than for personal gain, ruling that Rocco’s request was not in line with his fiduciary duties as executor. This ruling reminds executors of their ethical obligations to remain impartial and not use their position for personal advantage. You can explore the case in greater detail here.

Elder financial abuse is a growing concern. In the case of QZH [2023], an older people man’s son, acting as his enduring attorney, used his father’s assets for personal benefit. The Tribunal found that the son had acted beyond his legal authority, highlighting the importance of strict boundaries in power of attorney roles to protect older people individuals’ assets.

Another case, Rydzewski v Rydzewski, involved a 92-year-old woman who transferred significant assets to family members for negligible amounts. The court found that her family members had exerted undue influence over her, a form of financial abuse that often affects vulnerable older people. Both cases underscore how vital it is for families to put safeguards in place to prevent such exploitation, particularly for those who are highly reliant on others for their care and financial matters.

Protecting Your Loved Ones and Estate

These cases underscore the importance of proactive planning in elder law and succession. Clearly documenting mutual wills agreements, being careful with witnesses, and selecting trustworthy executors are all critical steps to secure your estate and protect family members from undue influence and financial abuse. If you need support in a similar matter, New South Lawyers’ experienced Wills & Estate Lawyers can help.

Contact New South Lawyers today to secure your representation and approach your case with confidence.