Navigating family law proceedings can be an emotionally and financially taxing experience, especially when determining who bears the burden of expenses. The case of Zschokke and Zschokke (1996) FLC 92-693; [1996] FamCA 79, sheds light on the complexities surrounding the questions about who pays the legal fees in a family law court case?

The facts of the case

In this case, the wife sought financial support from her former husband to cover her legal expenses, which had escalated to over $500,000. The central question before the court was whether the husband should be compelled to provide litigation funding to the wife, considering the circumstances of the case.

The court's decision hinged on several key factors outlined in the Family Law Act. Generally, each party in family law proceedings is responsible for their own legal costs, a principle enshrined in Section 117(1). However, the court has the discretion to deviate from this rule under certain circumstances.

What circumstances can be considered to decide who pays the legal fees in a family law court case?

To determine whether the husband should pay the wife's legal costs, the court assessed various criteria: These included:

Complexity of Financial Affairs: Firstly, the court examined whether the husband's financial affairs were intricate and required expert investigation. The conclusion was that the husband's financial situation was not complex, as he was unemployed with minimal assets.  Financial Strength: Secondly, the court considered whether the husband possessed considerable financial strength. In this case, the wife was deemed to be in a stronger asset position compared to the husband.  Capacity to Pay: Thirdly, the husband's ability to cover his own litigation costs was evaluated. Despite his claim of financial incapacity and lack of legal representation, the court was hesitant to impose a requirement on an unrepresented respondent to fund the other party's costs.  Applicant's Financial Resources: Finally, the wife's capacity to cover her own legal expenses was also scrutinised. While she had obtained funds from various sources, her inability to secure legal aid played a role in the court's decision.

What did the Family Law Court decide?

Ultimately, the court ruled against compelling the husband to pay the wife's legal costs. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the unique circumstances of each case and emphasised that such orders should not unduly burden an unrepresented party. This case underscores the complexity of determining whether a former spouse should pay the legal costs of the other party in family law proceedings. It highlights the need for a careful evaluation of factors such as financial strength, complexity of financial affairs, and the ability of both parties to cover their respective costs.

While the Court’s decision in Zschokke provides insight into this intricate issue of costs liability, it also serves as a reminder that family law cases are highly individualistic

We highly recommend seeking legal advice from our Family Lawyers if you are concerned about Who pays the legal fees in a divorce. To discuss your Family Law matter and find the best option for you, please contact our Sydney Family Law team on 02 9891 6388.

New South Lawyers’ communications are intended to provide commentary and general information. To that end, people should not rely on this communication as legal advice. Accordingly, they should seek formal legal advice for matters of interest arising from this communication.

To find out more, chat with a member of New South Lawyers' Family Law Team today.